Pages: [1]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: How do I ping,send,sense,precognition and Program?  (Read 335 times)
Tidues
Jr. Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 90


View Profile
« on: August 12, 2011, 08:48:18 AM »

I've read several articles on how to program and understanding constructs by Stolide Demens and XPwarrior3
One said that I can't program my psi ball to have an ability that I don't already have.

So does that mean that I have to ping sense send and have the ability of precognition and clairvoyance before I can tell my Psiballs to Sense and stuffs? If so, how do I attain these abilities?
I haven't been able to sense energy, even though I know i made a psi ball I have never really sensed one before, even after reading all of the articles (Perhaps i'm just dumb)

Since I cannot sense I don't know how to program or rather I don't even know if I really made a construct.

When I program do I just visualize what I want the Psiball to do and It will do it for me?

Please I really need to learn how to sense,send and ping and most importantly program.

Logged

The freedom you see is not the freedom I see.
flamedancer
Jr. Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 90


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 12, 2011, 09:27:31 AM »

The most simple, and practical, form of pinging is simply letting a person know, at distance, that you are thinking about them. Thinking about something is known as an intentional state. It is the most cliche form of psychic activity; knowing who is calling or that the phone will ring before it does. Once you get that pinned down, you can send burst of sensations. For example, I am thinking about you, and I am angry. I am thinking about you and I am sad. Rupert Sheldrake has created a simple exercise called the Telephone Telepathy Experiment which would be useful.

The Telephone Telepathy Experiment

While you don't have to follow the whole thing, the type of exercise is useful in learning how to ping someone, though, people vary. For example, my mind automatically feels out a particular range where it positions itself to get information about something that it thinks is important, but another person's mind may position itself so that it only gets information from a particular group of people. For example, I am more likely to know that my mother is trying to get my attention versus a complete stranger(this is also mirrored in experimental trials) since my mind will rule it as not important and leave it in the background. For the record, telepathically getting a person's attention, pinging, does not need psi energy, constructs, or anything else of that nature. It is a telepathic skill.  

Think of it along the lines of an organism scanning its environment for information that has meaning to it where it positions itself to sense more information. Think of anticipation. It looks, sees what gets its interest, and then it sits and listens based upon things that are associated with it or have meaning to it. So, if you shout something, telepathically, and a person's consciousness has positioned itself away from that intentional burst, it probably won't get their attention. To clarify, I am defining an intentional state as the content of the thought. What the thought is about. All thoughts are predicated by the thing that thinks it, thus, the content of every thought has an established context which is positioned relevant to a series of mental events.  

For example, how one feels about a mother is different than what they would think about their own mother. Both are mothers, but the content and thus the feelings would be different due to the positioning of it in regards to mental events(memories, emotions, feelings, etc.). In this sense, we can assign a particular direction in regards to the mind and intentional states/mental content. In this sense, I am positioned closer to my mother, experientially, than the generic a mother or your mother, thus, I am more likely to get information from my mother since I am closer to the origin of the emanating mental content. Keep that in mind while you practice. Also keep in mind that telepathic pining and energy manipulation/construct programming are not the same skills nor are they necessary for the other. Telepathy and clairvoyance are their own abilities. It varies with the person. For example, some telepathic and precognitive hybrids(like myself) can sense that in the future you will want to contact them, so they can predict your future thought prior to you sending it if you are in range. Now, by range, we can think of brackets arranged in frameworks per their associations. Think of something similar to a web or a series of constellations where brackets and how things move about are tied to experiential positions. I am me. I have my thoughts. You are you, and you have your thoughts. If there is an extended relation between my thoughts and your thoughts, a type of rapport, we can be aware of each others thoughts. If you move to me or I move to you, there can be an association which results in the brackets being more open placing us in range of each others thoughts. You can also assign this to physical events as well mental events in a sense. That is what I mean by range. It can be hard to wrap your head around since we are not discussing hard spatial ranges or boundaries(which do not exists in psychic interactions); rather, we have positions, relations, and self-relations within a deeper and more fundamental level of reality which gives rise to what is called the final cause. The finished product. The end result. Or, in short, physical and mental events.
« Last Edit: August 12, 2011, 09:59:32 AM by flamedancer » Logged


A Resource on Psi, Science, and Philosophy
Notagh
Sr. Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,330


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 12, 2011, 10:45:47 PM »

One said that I can't program my psi ball to have an ability that I don't already have.
I'm not sure why this would be true.  I would have to find and read the article to see the context/argument, but without it I would assume this is false.  At the very least a construct should be able to cause the same or similar effects to certain abilities that you are trying to implement without actually having to directly use a specific ability. 

Logged

stolide
Sr. Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,102



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: August 15, 2011, 01:23:39 PM »

Within the subtle energy line of thought, all magic works by the magician impressing his will upon energy. This means that there is essentially no difference (within the paradigm's reasoning of course) between explicitly bringing together a ball of energy and then giving it a set of instructions, and merely willing that set of instructions. As such, any thoughtforms that one would make would not be able to do any more than the magician who created them, because it is all really the same thing.
Logged

Ego sum bardo. Tu es bardas. Stulta solus reputat non.

flamedancer
Jr. Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 90


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: August 15, 2011, 07:04:16 PM »

Within the subtle energy line of thought, all magic works by the magician impressing his will upon energy. This means that there is essentially no difference (within the paradigm's reasoning of course) between explicitly bringing together a ball of energy and then giving it a set of instructions, and merely willing that set of instructions. As such, any thoughtforms that one would make would not be able to do any more than the magician who created them, because it is all really the same thing.

Energy working and/or magic is not necessary to letting a person know you are thinking about them at a distance(pinging). In my experience, a lot of energy workers make poor telepaths except for a small group that I know. Telepathic pinging is not magical. It is paranormal, but it is not magical(there is a subtle esoteric difference between magic and paranormal phenomena which is context dependent on the culture). Precognition, telepathy, clairvoyance, etc. are psychic/paranormal skills that can be used in magic and with energy working systems, but they are not the same. For example, a ceremonial magician can perform a ritual without having psychic abilities and an energy worker can make a construct without telepathy. In fact, a frustrating number of magicians and energy workers I speak to seem to have no or very little psychic aptitude... A lot of them dance around Crowley's definition of magic(Thelemites in particular) in which magic is defined as any intentional act of will in an explicit magickal context, thus, any intentional act can be considered magical without being paranormal. A pencil, for example, can be called magical since it is used for a magical function while displaying no tangible paranormal qualities whereas a person spinning the pencil with psychokinesis would be paranormal but not necessarily magical if it wasn't used for an explicit magical purpose. I am not agreeing with this definition, I am just pointing out how paranormal things don't have to be magical and vice versa. As you pointed out, Stolide, there is a distinct difference between energy and thought, but thoughts contain, within themselves, pieces of the whole which thought it combined with the experience of thinking this thought. This is a nature of predication. My thought about x. My thought contains the experience of thinking the thought about x. If x is a person where there is an extended level of predication(a connection of consciousness/inner experiences) then the person can tell I am thinking about them without involvement of what you call energy.    

Also, there is no need to use the word thoughtform. A thoughtform is a representation of the person who thinks it, thus, the appropriate term would be intention. When you use thoughtform in a context which makes it seem different than intention, you give the misconception that it is different than an intention. Phenomenologically, an intention is the aboutness of a thought. This is the form content of the thought which is extrinsically intertwined with the qualia of the person thinking the thought. If we are discussing what you are calling thoughtforms, as I stated, it contains the experience of the person, thus, it holds tacit information. Since psychic abilities are rooted in knowledge how not knowledge of or what, it is possible to channel psychic abilities that you do not possess by taking on the persona held within the thoughts. Paranormally, mediums were known for having this ability, though, debate arises on the source of the channeled persona and abilities. Of course, this lies outside of the reach of the subtle energy paradigm alone. 
« Last Edit: August 15, 2011, 07:23:21 PM by flamedancer » Logged


A Resource on Psi, Science, and Philosophy
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: