Further research on duality
(Category : Quantum research---metaphysical logs)
Understanding fractals is a huge breakthrough in mathematics and science. What is not recognised is that fractals extend internally as well as externally. It will be found that polarities are also fractalised. The particle/antiparticle dimension is within the context of a further higher-order particle/antiparticle system, and so on, that is, there will be a hierarchical system of polarities. The reason why science falls into the trap of not being aware of this, is illustrated by the experimental observation that the particle and antiparticle in collision annihilate one another---thus giving a zero and a mental and intellectual barrier which one cannot expand beyond (knowledgewise). But if it is recognised that this zero is relative; and in fact relative to the next higher-order fractal level, then one will avoid dogmatic, closed systems, which clearly prevent the proper evolution of knowledge. Thus the particle and antiparticle coming together apparently form a unity (in inner space), or zero (in our space), but actually is now part of another and thus has a polarity bias in the next fractal level.
Briefly, although all basic energies are vibrations, that is, of a wave-like nature, these energies will manifest a particle reality when observed objectively (by out-of-phase detection systems which include the ego perception). If one allows the energies to pass through two apertures (as in the two-slit experiment), an interference pattern is created on a screen. This verifies the wave nature of the energy. However, if one uses a detection system such as a photon counter, the energy will manifest a particle reality. Thus whether wave or particle characteristic depends on the method of observation. This is called a contextual observation; what is observed is in the context of the observer. Science has not yet recognised that all experience and perception is in the context of the observer. Man creates (and selects) his own reality---within fractal limitations and preset experiential programmes).
The wave-particle duality of quantum theory, although it has its counterpart in the above-mentioned duality---position/velocity (or momentum)---can be considered to be a 'vertical' duality since the waves have many probabilities, indicating higher dimensions (the particle is one probability in 3D). Nevertheless the wave-particle duality, from a lower perspective, might be considered to manifest a horizontal polarity, for example, an oscillation between space (an expansion) and a point (contraction into the particle).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The research of Duality stopped at this point and continue to integrity.
Notice this google page. This is from earching exact text from your article at a random point.
http://www.google.ca/search?rlz=1C1RNCN_enCA422CA422&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=method+of+observation.+This+is+called+a+contextual+observation%3B+what+is+observed+is+in+the+context+of+the+observer.+Science+has+not+yet+recognised+that+all+experience+and+perception+is+in+the+context+of+the+observer.+Man+creates+(and+selects)+his+own+reality---within+fractal+limitations+and+preset+experiential+programmes).
The top two pages? Where you got the article and when you posted it on shifted perspectives.
1. I never pick any articles from PSIONIC or MAGICK sites but good, construct is doing its job as usual.
This article is taken from
http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~noelh/index.htm a metaphysical site. The article is seen in full on
http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~noelh/Duality.htm2. Please quote any of bolding, underlines, changes text sizes unless you are smarter than yourself
Ok
Further research on duality
(Category : Quantum research---metaphysical logs)
Understanding fractals is a huge breakthrough in mathematics and science. What is not recognised is that fractals extend internally as well as externally ... depends on the method of observation ... Man creates (and selects) his own reality---within fractal limitations and preset experiential programmes).
These underlines, bolding and italics are not in the article, I guess I am smarter than myself.
3. You don't know me. I always credits if I quote, you got problem with your brain please proceed to mental hospital
There are no credits in the post of the article that I quoted.
4. I thought we only can get PhD through college, you are very smart
Are you trying to say that you aren't getting your PHD from college? Or just making a point that it's common sense you're trying to get a PHD from an institution with plagiarized work? I'll bold this.
Hold on...
Please excuse me. Please return my work.
The articles above are part of my PhD research journals, collected and edited within my groups. Why would I re-summarize works that I have done? Although I didn't write the whole part, I contribute some parts.
This is stupid.
Plagiarizing my group works(college). Effing ridiculous.
It's not my fault, Lloyd Fafanuten. Please excuse me.Either way, I will keep do my logs as usual.
Here is why I know you didn't write these articles. Your English is terrible, and you expect us to believe that you wrote:
Physical reality is governed by collective consciousness therefore, transcending physical laws is not as easy as it seems in the face of consensus reality. Since the majority of people do not believe such things are possible yet, it is much more difficult to manifest those abilities in present time. But as collective consciousness changes over time, humans will be able to manifest more and more superhuman abilities starting with the more readily acceptable to the more outrageous kind.
I feel sad that I'm always attempting to protect rationality or prevent people from chasing unwarranted claims. I just want to help people with insight I've gained.
Enoch Tan, I'm sorry this guy stole your work.
My next few posts will be super nice, and give helpful information. I don't want to feel sad any more.