To be honest, I don't know how bad or good it is, since I haven't seen it yet. I was trying to clarify JediKaren's point.
If you like, I can take a look when I get home. I appear to be good at writing articles and giving feedback, so maybe I'll be of help
EDIT: Okay, I checked it out.
The first impression I get is that you're trying to literally talk to people as you would if you were to meet them in person, and have a nice informal conversation with them. I realize this is tempting, and I have made the same mistakes many times for papers, articles, reports, websites and even what was supposed to be a scientific article on measuring GHB in blood, urine and soda drinks. Try not to do this. Instead, try to write as if you're writing a book. You want to use sentences that are pleasant to read and gramatically correct, without overusing complicated terms. The use of said terms is entirely dependent on your audience, for instance:
"This article aims to describe a method for the quantification of gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) in human plasma, urine and carbonated drinks using gas chromatogtaphy coupled to a flame ionisation detector."
would be very good for an article aimed at scientists, but completely unfit for the general public. On the other hand
"This article explains the basics of measuring the amount of GHB in human blood, urine and soda drinks."
is more pleasing to read for the everyday audience, but would leave a scientist immediately looking for a better article. Either way, make complete, grammatically correct sentences with correct use of punctuation, and try to keep spelling errors to an absolute minimum.
On the other hand there is, as JediKaren says, a lack of detailed information. There's just not enough content.
All in all, not a bad site, but it needs some work in order to really attract people.
If you need more info, just tell me, I'm always happy to help.
